Skip to content
P Pexels logo

Pexels

NOT REALLY

Free stock photos and videos under a permissive licence, no attribution required.

NOT REALLY

why this verdict

Keep it — Google has not replaced it

Google's version overlaps, but does not finish the stock media job, so this one is still worth keeping open.

A named launch, not a vibe named, unlinked
Free image generation making generic stock photos unnecessary. Google, January 9, 2025 — no announcement link recorded yet.
How much of the job it covers not the job editorial call
Parts of it. The job still needs the tool to get finished.
Is there a free way to do it? yes
3 of 3 listed replacements have a usable free tier: Unsplash, Pixabay and Lummi.
What the call is worth nothing to cancel
No paid entry tier tracked, so there is no subscription to cancel.
Reason composed from the fields above missing: announcement linked recorded: free replacement listed recorded: two or more escape hatches
Threatened by
Google
Since
January 9, 2025
List price
free
Per year
—

The backstory

Pexels gives away photos and video clips that anyone can use commercially without attribution. Generated images now cover the generic filler shot, which is most of what stock was used for. Pexels was already free, so there is no revenue to lose from that shift, and it keeps the advantage of being real photography with a clear licence. Free plus real beats generated plus ambiguous for a lot of use cases.

Escape hatches

3 of 3 replacements have a usable free tier.

Agree with the verdict? Cast a vote — or tell us why it is wrong .

more Stock Media · 5 killed

view all 18 →

also on Google's list